FILTRIX Logo FILTRIX Find Your Edge →

Calculating & Accounting Machines (No Electronic Computers) Stocks

SIC 3578 | 3 tickers analyzed | 28 total alerts

📊
3
Tickers
🔔
28
Total Alerts
🎯
34.8%
Avg Win Rate
💰
-3.06%
Avg Gain

📈 Sector Performance by Timeframe

5-Minute

Avg Gain: -0.21%
Win Rate: 44.4%

15-Minute

Avg Gain: -2.54%
Win Rate: 32.1%

30-Minute

Avg Gain: -2.66%
Win Rate: 28.6%

60-Minute

Avg Gain: -3.23%
Win Rate: 33.3%

EOD

Avg Gain: -6.68%
Win Rate: 35.7%

MFE/MAE

Avg MFE: +5.46%
Avg MAE: -3.12%

📋 Calculating & Accounting Machines (No Electronic Computers) Stocks (3)

All tickers in SIC 3578 with Trade-Ideas alert data, sorted by alert count.

# Ticker Company Market Cap Alerts Avg Win Rate Avg 5min MFE Action
1 DBD Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated $2.51B 23 33.0% -0.26% +5.09% View →
2 NATL NCR Atleos Corporation $2.78B 3 73.3% +0.43% +2.75% View →
3 VYX NCR Voyix Corporation $1.45B 2 10.0% -0.38% +0.72% View →

🚀 Scan for Alpha in Calculating & Accounting Machines (No Electronic Computers)

Don't trade the whole basket.
Use FILTRIX to isolate the top performing stocks among the 3 companies in this sector. Filter by MFE, Volume, and Win Rate instantly.

Find Best Setups →

📊 Calculating & Accounting Machines (No Electronic Computers) Sector Intelligence

⚡ High Volatility Sector

The Calculating & Accounting Machines (No Electronic Computers) sector (SIC 3578) aggregates data from 3 stocks. With an average Maximum Favorable Excursion (MFE) of +5.46%, this sector is highly aggressive, suited for experienced volatility traders looking for explosive moves.

📈 Statistical Expectancy

Across 28 analyzed alerts, the sector shows a 34.8% Win Rate with an average gain of -3.06%.

⚠️ This suggests a difficult trading environment where strict stock selection is critical. Focus on the top performers within this sector.

📉 Relative Performance

Trading this sector requires extreme caution. Even the top-ranked ticker, DBD , only manages a 33.0% win rate across 23 alerts.

Since this barely matches the sector average (34.8%), traditional trend-following strategies may fail here. Consider counter-trend or mean-reversion approaches instead.